MOTS-c
Preclinical native-peptide evidence alongside a registered human study; registration is not a reported result.
Signal summary
MOTS-c is a good example of an evidence transition: historically dominated by animal and mechanistic work, now entering a meaningful randomized human trial.
Study details
Doses studied — not a dosing recommendation. Regimens belong to the named study, formulation and population.
Registered phase 2a insulin-sensitivity trial
- Population
- Adults with prediabetes and overweight/obesity; estimated enrollment 120.
- Doses and administration studied
- Fixed-dose subcutaneous injection once daily; numerical dose not disclosed in the reviewed registry entry.
- Duration
- 12 weeks of treatment
- Reported finding / status
- Insulin sensitivity is being studied; no results were available in the reviewed record.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Registration does not establish human efficacy or an established dosing regimen. Estimated enrollment is not the number who completed treatment.
Source tier D · Read the original study or record
Outcome Evidence Strength
Awaiting human efficacy results. Preclinical hypotheses are not evidence of a clinical recomposition benefit.
What is actually established?
- The captured Phase 2a registration describes a planned study in adults with prediabetes and overweight/obesity; current recruitment was not reverified.
- The study is designed to test whether 12 weeks of investigational MOTS-c improves insulin sensitivity versus placebo.
- The registered study plans an estimated 120 participants and standardized lifestyle counseling.
What is not established?
- No human efficacy results are established in the reviewed Phase 2a record.
- Preclinical metabolic effects do not establish human weight-loss or body-recomposition efficacy.
- Broad anti-aging or performance claims remain outside the mature human evidence base.
Evidence sources
MOTS-c for Improving Insulin Sensitivity in Adults With Prediabetes and Overweight/Obesity
October 15 maturity correction
M1 describes the reviewed native-MOTS-c evidence. A planned trial does not establish preliminary human findings, and CB4211 analogue exposure cannot substitute for native-peptide results. The four outcome scores remain 0/5 in the reviewed record.